Cases 1 - 10 of 14
(PC) Van Huisen v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
United States of America, Clinton Administration, K. Bieker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derrick Smith v. Google, LLC, et al
as 23-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC, GOOGLE, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION and others
Derrick Smith v. Google, LLC, et al
as 23-1198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC, GOOGLE, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION and others
McClain et al v. Pence et al
as 1:2022cv23738
Defendant:
Charles Terrance Canady, Michael Richard Pence doing business as U.S.A. Inc., Gary Gensler Agency Chairman doing business as US Securities Exchange Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Terence M. McClain, Linda N. McClain, Edward G. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jennings Walker
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation and PhotoDNA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Microsoft
as 2:2019cv00403
Plaintiff:
Christopher Micheal Taylor
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byng v. Guerrero et al
as 1:2017cv00575
Plaintiff:
Kevin V. Byng
Defendant:
Myra Colon Guerrero and Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. United States Army et al
as 2:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Blake Lee Reyes
Defendant:
United States Army, Windermere Real Estate, Portland City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemppainen v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2014cv00569
Plaintiff:
Gordon Kirk Kemppainen
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
