Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv04143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arvest Bank v. MIDWAY MOTORS/ASBURY, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00797
Plaintiff:
Arvest Bank
Defendant:
MIDWAY MOTORS/ASBURY, LLC , GAYLE DIETZ and RAELENE DIETZ
Counter_claimant:
RAELENE DIETZ , GAYLE DIETZ and MIDWAY MOTORS/ASBURY, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Arvest Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANZ v MIDWAY MOTORS LLC, et al
as 3:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS ANN MANZ
Defendant:
MIDWAY MOTORS LLC and LIAQUAT A CHOUDHRY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981
Sava v. Hendershot et al
as 2:2011cv14326
Plaintiff:
Michael Sava
Defendant:
Craig A. Hendershot, Midway Motors, Inc. and Litz I. Hendershot
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Los Angeles Unified School District v. BP America Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01181
Defendant:
BP America Inc, Does, Hankey Investment Company, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Unified School District
David Flynn, et al v. GMAC
as 09-3940
Debtor:
In re: MIDWAY MOTOR SALES, INC.
Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
Appellant:
DAVID A. FLYNN and DAVID A. FLYNN, INC.
In re: Midway Motor Sales
as 08-8109
Debtor:
In re: MIDWAY MOTOR SALES, INC.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID A. FLYNN and DAVID A. FLYNN, INC.
Trustee - Appellee:
ELAINE GREAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDWAY MOTOR SALES, INC.
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
In re: Midway Motor Sales, In
as 08-8008
Debtor:
In re: MIDWAY MOTOR SALES, INC.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID A. FLYNN and DAVID A. FLYNN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
ELAINE GREAVES, MIDWAY MOTOR SALES, INC. and MICHAEL MERCURE
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
