Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States v. Miguel Avalos-Diaz
as 23-3688
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Miguel Avalos-Diaz
Jose Avalos v. Ben Curry
as 12-15790
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSE MIGUEL AVALOS
Respondent - Appellee: BEN CURRY
Eison et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 3:2011cv01523
Plaintiff: Bennie Eison and Kim Eison
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, NA, NuView Financial Services and Miguel Avalos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miguel Avalos-Vasquez v. Joseph Norwood et al
as 2:2009cv02002
Petitioner: Miguel Avalos-Vasquez
Respondent: Joseph Norwood, Joseph Norwood and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States v. Avalos-Vasquez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-4013
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MIGUEL AVALOS-VASQUEZ
United States v. Avalos-Vasquez, et al
as 09-4000
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MIGUEL AVALOS-VASQUEZ
Avalos v. Curry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00949
Petitioner: Jose Miguel Avalos
Respondent: Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avalos-Vasquez v. USA
as 2:2007cv00948
Petitioner: Miguel Avalos-Vasquez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Avalos-Vasquez v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv00420
Petitioner: Miguel Avalos-Vasquez
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Aaron, et al v. Atchison Topeka We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1996cv06180
Plaintiff: Burl J Aaron, Jacky Lee Aaron , John - Aaron and others
Defendant: Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?