Cases 21 - 30 of 64
The Hampton Company National Surety, LLC et al v. Byrd et al
as 1:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
The Hampton Company National Surety, LLC , A-24/7 Bail Bonds , Joseph Nievies Cantu, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Mike Byrd and Jackson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McBride v. Byrd et al
as 1:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
William D. McBride
Defendant:
Mike Byrd and Micheal Versiga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Vergiga et al
as 1:2012cv00344
Plaintiff:
William D. McBride
Defendant:
Michael Vergiga, Mike Byrd and Jackson County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh et al v. Byrd et al
as 1:2012cv00299
Plaintiff:
Donald Pugh , Percy Gusta and Priscilla Gusta
Defendant:
Mike Byrd and Jackson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McElhenney v. Byrd et al
as 1:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
Leon McElhenney
Defendant:
Mike Byrd, Unknown Grady, Unknown Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jackson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Johnson
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff's Department , Mike Byrd , Linda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Byrd et al
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Leon Valentino Coleman
Defendant:
Mike Byrd, Jackson County Sheriff Department, Ken Broadus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Jackson County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
David Bruce Allen
Defendant:
Jackson County, Mississippi, Jackson County Sheriff Department, Mike Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Borden v. Jackson County, MS et al
as 1:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
Barron Borden
Defendant:
Jackson County, MS, Ken Broadus, Mike Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullum v. Byrd
as 1:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jerome McCullum
Defendant:
Mike Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
