Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Clark-Alonso v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07487
Plaintiff:
Mike Clark-Alonso
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., DOES 1 through 100 and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as The Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dean Abbott et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05002
Plaintiff:
Dean Abbott, Gerald Abell, Aisha Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Clark-Alonso et al v. Southwest Airlines Co. et al
as 3:2019cv06113
Defendant:
Southwest Airlines Co.
Plaintiff:
Mike Clark-Alonso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mary Benafel v. United States Department of Tr, et al
as 16-35827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY C. BENAFEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ANTHONY FOXX, ROSS REINEKE and others
Benafel v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 6:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Benafel
Defendant:
George Brown, City of Eugene, Mike Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03160
Plaintiff:
Oscar Torres , Doris Lawson , Russell Randol and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Pecial_master:
Belinda Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ploof v. United States of America Department of The Interior Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2009cv03736
Plaintiff:
Donald George Ploof
Defendant:
United States of America Department of The Interior Bureau of Land Management, Napa County Sheriff's Department, County of Napa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Charles Wiper, Inc., v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2008cv06226
Plaintiff:
Charles Wiper, Inc., and Charles Wiper, Inc.,
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Kitty Piercy, Bonny Bettman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
