Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Porter v. West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 3:2014cv26583
Plaintiff:
Robert Porter
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority, Mike Clark, PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 3:2014cv17012
Plaintiff:
Gary Carroll
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority, Mike Clark and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chafin v. Western Regional Jail et al
as 3:2013cv01706
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
Mike Clark , Director of West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority , Officer Mathew Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Clark
as 3:2012cv07928
Plaintiff:
Mark Delane Ward
Defendant:
Mike Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ward v. Clark
as 3:2012cv07283
Petitioner:
Mark Delane Ward
Respondent:
Mike Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ward v. Clark
as 3:2012cv06386
Petitioner:
Mark Delane Ward
Respondent:
Mike Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Plymale et al
as 3:2012cv06186
Plaintiff:
Mark Delane Ward
Defendant:
Lauren Plymale, Mike Clark, Alfred E. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeney v. Cabell County Prosecuting Attorneys Office
as 3:2012cv01922
Plaintiff:
James Keeney
Defendant:
Cabell County Prosecuting Attorneys Office, West Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Mike Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyser v. Clark
as 3:2011cv00400
Petitioner:
Terry Hyser
Respondent:
Mike Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
