Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jackson v. Hershberger et al
as 4:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson and Artemis Adams Anderson Andersen
Defendant:
Edwin Hershberger, Mike Reed, Damon Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haas v. Reed
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keegan Haas
Defendant:
Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Reed
as 6:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Edward Scott Downs
Respondent:
Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. Reed
as 4:2022cv00288
Petitioner:
Edward Scott Downs
Respondent:
Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. Reed
as 4:2022cv00265
Petitioner:
Edward Scott Downs
Respondent:
Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Edward S Downs
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County, Muskogee County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Compher et al v. Burnett et al
as 4:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioner of Mayes County, State of Oklahoma, The, Mike Reed and Brittany Burnett
Plaintiff:
WL, AC, Kaylee Thurlo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. County Commissioners of Mayes County et al
as 4:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Natasha Dodson
Defendant:
County Commissioners of Mayes County , Mike Reed , Gary Shrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00606
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee Wilkins
Defendant:
Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc., Oklahoma Sheriffs'Association, The, Jason Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montes v. Reed
as 4:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Autumn Montes
Defendant:
Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
