Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dowell v. National Security Agency and Archives et al
as 6:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond Dowell
Defendant:
National Security Agency and Archives, Austin Loyd, Mike Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Richard-Coulibaly v. Mike Smith Auto Group et al
as 1:2016mc00012
Petitioner:
Thefarro Richard-Coulibaly
Defendant:
Mike Smith Auto Group, Nicholas Kem, FNU Wade and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Udayasiri v. Mike Smith Autoplaza
as 1:2015cv00436
Plaintiff:
Tara Collins Udayasiri
Defendant:
Mike Smith Autoplaza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ray v. Grier et al
as 4:2015cv02926
Plaintiff:
Tuezday N Ray
Defendant:
Terry Grier, Gregory T Nix, Carolina Boet-Bolanas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ray v. Grier et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC 15-2329. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2015mc02329
Plaintiff:
Tuezday N Ray
Defendant:
Terry Grier, Gregory T Nix, Carolina Boet-Bolanas and others
Zachary v. HARRIS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
Jessy L. Zachary
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY JAIL, Mike Smith and Adrain Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solt et al v. The Galloway School et al
as 4:2011cv02845
Plaintiff:
Lori T. Solt and John M. Solt
Defendant:
The Galloway School, Bonnie Cerace, MIke Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Microcheck Systems, Inc et al v. Nunez et al
as 4:2009cv03567
Plaintiff:
Microcheck Systems, Inc and Microcheck Solutions, Inc
Defendant:
Donald J Nunez, Michoice Technology Systems, Inc and Mike Smith
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
