Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Stine v. USA
as 3:2017cv08121
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Stine v. USA
as 2:2017cv02050
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Mikeal Stine v. L. Milusnic, et al
as 17-55464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
L. J. MILUSNIC, Warden, MDC-LA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL, Los Angeles and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, MDC-LA
Mikeal Glenn Stine v. L. Milusnic
as 2:2017cv02079
Respondent:
Mr L. Milusnic
Petitioner:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Mikeal Glenn Stine v. L. Milusnic et al
as 2:2017cv01970
Defendant:
Mr L. Milusnic, U.S. Marshal Los Angeles and Unknown Defendants
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Mikeal Stine v. USDC-CALA
as 14-73124
:
In re: MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Petitioner:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
CHARLES THOMAS WEEKS, II, United States Marshal, JOHN DOE 1, United States Marshal, JOHN DOE 2, United States Marshal and others
Mikeal Stine v. Charles Weeks, II
as 14-56503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES THOMAS WEEKS, II, United States Marshal
Mikeal Glenn Stine v. Charles Thomas Weeks et al
as 2:2014cv06424
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Stine et al v. San Bernardino County Jail et al
as 5:2008cv00403
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine and Raymond Oechsle
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Jail, J Trotter, D. Florence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mikeal Stine et al v. San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center
as 5:2008cv00344
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine and Raymond Oechsle
Defendant:
San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center, San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center, Trotter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
