Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Mikeal Stine v. Charles Weeks, II
as 14-56503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES THOMAS WEEKS, II, United States Marshal
Mikeal Glenn Stine v. Charles Thomas Weeks et al
as 2:2014cv06424
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Stine et al v. San Bernardino County Jail et al
as 5:2008cv00403
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine and Raymond Oechsle
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Jail, J Trotter, D. Florence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mikeal Stine et al v. San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center
as 5:2008cv00344
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine and Raymond Oechsle
Defendant:
San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center, San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center, Trotter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stine et al v. San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center
as 5:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine and Raymond Oechsle
Defendant:
San Bernardino West Valley Detention Center/County Jail, Trotter, D. Florence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stine et al v. San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center et al
as 3:2008cv00215
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine and Raymond Oechsle
Defendant:
San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center, Trotter, D Florence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stine et al v. San Bernardino County Jail et al
as 3:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine and Raymond Oechsie
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Jail, J Trotter, D Florence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stine v. Reeves
as 2:2007cv00581
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Michael S. Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
