Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Zulu v. Ivey et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Muzuz Mussun Ali Bamu Zulu and Milton Dudley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Karen Williams, Elizabeth Laseter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
James Milton Cain
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Mr. Baldwin, Charles McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Fitzpatrick et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00393
Defendant:
T. Jones, Gallew David, D. Swift and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuevas v. Reyes-Sacin et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00726
Defendant:
Desai Deepthi, Thomas G. Kincer, Mohmannad Ifran and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Cuevas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hambright v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Milton Leon Hambright
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Eddie Cook, Jr., Cliff Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
Gregory Milton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00690
Plaintiff:
Andrew Milton Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Broadhead v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00544
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Warden Butler, V. Baldwin, Correctional Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Palmer et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00529
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Milton Palmer, Timothy Scott, V. Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
