Cases 21 - 30 of 340
Broome v. Temple Texas Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Richard Broome
Defendant:
Temple Texas Police Department, Temple Texas Code Enforcment Employees, Sgt M. Trunecker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell Textron Inc. v. Milton
as 4:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
Bell Textron Inc.
Defendant:
Trevor Milton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Tarver v. Collier
as 3:2022cv01616
Petitioner:
Milton Lee Tarver
Respondent:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moreno v. Bollinger
as 2:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Victor Moreno
Defendant:
Milton Troy Bollinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 3:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
Milton Stanley
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc doing business as The Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Story et al v. AZAIEZ et al
as 1:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Story and Dustin Clark
Defendant:
Hafedh Azaiez, Amber Feller, Tiffanie Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chi v. Schell et al
as 4:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Anson Chi
Defendant:
Richard A. Schell, Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, Andrew Milton Stover and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hinson v. City of Abilene et al
as 1:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Milton Hinson
Defendant:
City of Abilene, Craig Jordan and C Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. The State of Texas
as 3:2022cv00743
Petitioner:
Mark Milton Moore and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
