Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mims v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Linda L Mims
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mims v. Bank of America
as 6:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
DeTrayvion Mims
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mims v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 6:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
DeMichael Ladale Mims
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mims v. Capital One Auto Finance et al
as 3:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Jamel Mims
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Finance and Lone Star Cadillac
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Mims v. Ra Sushi Addison Corp
as 3:2022cv01437
Plaintiff:
Ayasha Mims
Defendant:
Ra Sushi Addison Corp. and Ra Sushi Addison Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rudzavice et al v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00176
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mims v. Director
as 5:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Mims
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
