Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05405
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Diehl v. Min et al
as 8:2026cv02662
Plaintiff:
Anthony Diehl
Defendant:
Dave Min, Dave Min for Congress and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lee v. Foris Dax, Inc., et al.
as 26-5981
Plaintiff:
JUNG MIN LEE
Defendant:
FORIS DAX, INC., doing business as Crypto.com, FIRST REPUBLIC BANK, Receiver Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and CATHERINE EVANS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09046
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04885
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Daniel Carlos Garcia v. NBC Universal Media, LLC et al
as 5:2026cv04786
Defendant:
Anthony Ukalovic, NBC Universal Media LLC, Comcast Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carlos Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hu v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 1:2026cv02237
Plaintiff:
Min Hu
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Selman & Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
