Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Eric Sorenson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1785
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson, also known as Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Department of Human Services, (DHS) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law and others
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 24-1318
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities, Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities and others
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 23-2319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities., Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities. and others
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 23-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities., Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities. and others
Eric Sorenson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 22-1057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Michael Sorenson, also known as Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota, All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Department of Human Services, (DHS) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv01511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Eric Sorenson v. MN Dept of Human Services, et al
as 20-1890
Defendant / Appellee:
Doe No. 2, as the person whom met with the Plaintiff on February 3, 2020, to offer a waiver offer on the respective disciplinary report at issue, Jane/John Does, as unknown individuals; All Defendants have and continue to act under Color of State Law, All Defendants are currently sued in their official and individual capacities, Barry D. Giersdorf-Thompson, Security Counselor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Raymond Semler, et al v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 16-4043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raymond Leon Semler and Paul J. Knutson
Defendant - Appellee:
Cal Ludeman, Former Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Dennis Benson, Chief Executive Officer of Minnesota Sex Offender Program-MSOP, Daniel Storkamp, MSOP Deputy Director and others
Eric Michael Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human, et al
as 16-2090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant - Appellee:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, ("MDHS"), Minnesota Sex Offender Program, ("MSOP"), Lucinda Jesson and others
Doranti v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2015cv03247
Plaintiff:
Sarprio Doranti
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, Susan L. Churchill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
