Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Minnesota Voters Alliance et al v. Ellison et al
as 0:2023cv02774
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Voters Alliance, Mary Amlaw and Ken Wendling
Counter Defendant:
Tim Kirk
Defendant:
Keith Ellison and Brad Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Tim Walz, et al
as 20-3072
Defendant / Appellee:
Keith M. Ellison, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Minnesota, or his successor, Christopher A. Samuel, in his official capacity as Ramsey County Auditor, or his successor, Mark Vincent Chapin, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Auditor, or his successor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andy Cilek, Craig Jones, Craig Anderson and others
Minnesota Voters Alliance et al v. City of Minneapolis
as 0:2020cv02049
Plaintiff:
Ronald Moey, Charles R. Halverson, Blair L. Johnson and others
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Minnesota Voters Alliance et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2020cv01688
Defendant:
John Choi, Keith Ellison, Mike Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Crockett, Craig Anderson, Yvonne Hundshamer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Minnesota Voters Alliance et al v. Saint Paul, City of, The et al
as 0:2019cv00358
Plaintiff:
Garfield Court Partnership, LLP, Charles Halverson, Well Maintained Apartments and others
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of, The and Saint Paul, City of, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Mark Ritchie
as 15-1741
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Majority
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Minnesota Voters Alliance, Minnesota Northstar Tea Party Patriots, Election Integrity Watch and others
Defendant:
Joe Mansky, in his official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County, Virginia Gelms, in her individual and official capacity as the Elections Manager for Hennepin County, Mike Freeman, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Attorney and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Mark Ritchie, in his official capacity as Secretary of State
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Mark Ritchie
as 15-1741
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Majority
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Minnesota Voters Alliance, Minnesota Northstar Tea Party Patriots, Election Integrity Watch and others
Defendant:
Joe Mansky, in his official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County, Virginia Gelms, in her individual and official capacity as the Elections Manager for Hennepin County, Mike Freeman, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Attorney and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Steve Simon, in his official capacity as Secretary of State
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Joe Mansky, et al
as 15-1682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Minnesota Majority, Minnesota Voters Alliance, Minnesota Northstar Tea Party Patriots and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Joe Mansky, in his official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County, Virginia Gelms, in her individual and official capacity as the Elections Manager for Hennepin County, Mike Freeman, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Attorney and others
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Mark Ritchie, et al
as 12-2946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Minnesota Voters Alliance, Minnesota Freedom Council, Sondra Erickson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Ritchie, individually and in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Minnesota, and his successors, Lori Swanson, individually and in her official capacity as the Minnesota Attorney General, and her successors, Joe Mansky, individually and in his official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County, Minnesota, and his successors and others
Minnesota Voters Alliance et al v. Ritchie et al
as 0:2012cv00519
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Voters Alliance , Minnesota Freedom Council , Sondra Erickson and others
Defendant:
Mark Ritchie , Lori Swanson , Joe Mansky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
