Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Truist Bank v. 4420 North Fairfax LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank f/k/a Branch Banking and Trust Company, Truist Bank and Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
4420 North Fairfax LLC and Peter C. Minshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vargas, Conrad v. Mann, Robert et al
as 3:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Barry Clark, Robert Mann, Larry Bonner and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Conrad Lee Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minshall v. United States Marshal et al
as 3:2020cv01433
Respondent:
Attorney General, Physical Custodian Bradford County Jail and United States Marshal
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Minshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chute et al v. Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04711
Defendant:
Brian P. Kelley, Benjamin C. Singer, Julie M.B. Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Minshall and Gary Chute
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Minshall v. State Attorney et al
as 3:2020cv00968
Respondent:
State Attorney, Judge Sonny Scaff and Wesley Douglas
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Minshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MINSHALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv02721
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHAN MINSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conrad, Chad v. Dougherty, Jodi et al
as 3:2019cv00369
Defendant:
David Flieger, Jodi A. Dougherty, Erin Dunahay and others
Plaintiff:
Chad J. Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fahmy et al v. Glessner
as 1:2017cv00895
Plaintiff:
Sherin Fahmy , Basem Fahmy , Tarek Fahmy and others
Defendant:
Austin Edward Glessner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vargas, Conrad v. Mann, R. et al
as 3:2016cv00565
Plaintiff:
Conrad Lee Vargas
Defendant:
Robert Mann , Barry Clark , Minshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
