Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mobley v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Mobley
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anez v. Riverbully LLC et al
as 3:2023cv08527
Plaintiff:
Rafael Anez
Defendant:
Riverbully LLC, Bryonna Lynne Mobley, Unknown Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Gonzalez v. Riverbully LLC et al
as 3:2023cv08528
Plaintiff:
Francisco Gonzalez
Defendant:
Riverbully LLC, Bryonna Lynne Mobley, Unknown Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Channel v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01461
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Channel, Sr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02239
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rosalie Mobley and Kenneth Mobley
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mobley et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00975
Plaintiff:
Kathy Mobley and Billy James Mobley
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mobley v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv01542
Plaintiff:
Duane Kern Mobley
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa, County of and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mobley v. State of Arizona
as 3:2007cv08095
Petitioner:
Eleanor Sue Mobley
Respondent:
State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
