Cases 1 - 10 of 21
In Re: Da Graca, et al
as 20-2117
Interested Party:
OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner:
JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent:
THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Constr. Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust v. Carbonite, Inc., et al
as 20-2110
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY FOLGER, MOHAMAD S. ALI and CARBONITE, INC.
Defendant:
LINDA CONNLY, MARINA LEVINSON, CHARLES F. KANE and others
Interested Party:
CAMELOT EVENT DRIVEN FUND, A Series of Frank Funds Trust, TOM JOHNATAN OR-PAZ, PETER WU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS JOINT PENSION TRUST
Plaintiff:
VALERIE COSGROVE, RUBEN A. LUNA, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, WILLIAM FENG, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party:
JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner:
MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Tasco v. Angle et al
as 1:2020cv10253
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Mohamad Ali, Andrew Miller and others
Plaintiff:
William Tasco
Ruhfass v. Ali et al
as 1:2020cv10133
Defendant:
Rueybin Kao, iRobot Corporation, Mohamad Ali and others
Plaintiff:
Alexa Ruhfass
Katz et al v. Ali et al
as 1:2020cv10089
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Mohamad Ali, Ruey-Bin Kao and others
Plaintiff:
David Katz and Thomas Wightman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0078 j
Truman v. Angle et al
as 1:2020cv10034
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Mohamad Ali, Andrew Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Truman
Randolph v. Ali et al
as 1:2019cv12212
Defendant:
Anthony Folger, Mohamad S. Ali, Linda Connly and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Randolph
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
