Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Rodriguez v. Silk Road Properties, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00541
Plaintiff:
Xavier Rodriguez
Defendant:
Silk Road Properties, LLC, Donya, LLC and Mohamad Javadi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Ostrander v. Salvador et al
as 7:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ostrander
Defendant:
Adan I Salvador, Scott Szczepinski, Lea Broyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Thompson et al
as 9:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Billy Thompson, Gib Lewis Unit, Misty Harkridar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Tche Tche LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Tche Tche LLC , Haidar Alrawi and Mohamad Zaki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mayfield v. Dickerson et al
as 9:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Kent Dickerson, Thomas Donohue, Mohamad Sarhami and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Ghandour et al
as 4:2015cv03351
Plaintiff:
Juan Garcia
Defendant:
Mohamad N Ghandour and Houston Direct Auto, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Tawil et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 4:2015cv03294
Plaintiff:
Mohamad A Tawil and Patricia A Tawil
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, LLC and New Penn Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khalil v. Holder, et al
as 1:2013mc00486
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Mohamad Khalil
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Mohamad et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01236
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Mohamad and Deviranie Elizabeth Mohamad
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Albert Bell, Jr. v. Cody Ginsel, et al
as 12-41361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT BELL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARRY B. GREGORY, CHRIS A. SIMMONS, L. MCCULLIM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
