Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mohammed v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00657
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Plaintiff:
Kazim Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TD Bank NA v. Eagles Landing Properties LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01840
Defendant:
Mohamed K Makawi, MKKM Inc, Eagles Landing Properties LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TD Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Mohammed v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 6:2020cv02523
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kevin K Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Danny Group, LLC et al v. City of Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2019cv02087
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Karam, Blazian Promotions & Company, LLC, Natalie Trota-Litsey and others
Defendant:
David Sebok, Myrtle Beach Downtown Redevelopment Corporation, John Pederson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00482
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
