Cases 11 - 20 of 250
Ortiz v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2023cv02479
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ortiz
Defendant:
Moises Villalobos, Clarance L Houston, Sekou Dolley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hay v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 3:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Herbert Darrell Hay and Deboarah Noe
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Owens Murrary, Joseph Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Collier
as 23-20231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Luis A. Mendoza
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Angela Chevalier, Moises Villalobos and others
Cuevas v. Novoa
as 23-10382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moises Cuevas, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Humberto Novoa, Adrian Zamarripa, Azteca Records L.L.C. and others
Clarence v. Villalobos
as 3:2023cv00766
Petitioner:
Adams Edward Clarence
Respondent:
Moises Villalobos and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Villalobos
as 6:2023cv00129
Petitioner:
Darryl Wayne Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Moises Villalobos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Campos-Espinosa
as 23-40156
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Moises Campos-Espinosa, also known as Chiche
Alvarado v. Miller et al
as 5:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Moises Alvarado
Defendant:
Randall Lawrence Miller, C.R. England, Inc. and C.R. England, Inc. doing business as C.R. England Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Anderson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Chad Anderson
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, C.F. Hazelwood and Moises Villalobas, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
