Cases 1 - 10 of 996
Berg, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2433
Respondent:
KRIZIA BERG, GRACE BRYANT, NOELANI DEL ROSARIO-SABET and others
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff
Lambert v. Kastle, et al.
as 24-1635
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LAMBERT
Defendant:
MIRIAM KASTLE, Monroe Correctional Complex (SOU), DENNIS MCNEMARA, Monroe Correctional Complex (SOU), KATHY GREY, Monroe Correctional Complex (SOU) and others
Five Star Bank v. Mott et al
as 6:2024cv06153
Plaintiff:
Five Star Bank
Defendant:
Katherine Mott, Robert Harris, KRM Events, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ejonga-Deogracias v. Sinclair, et al.
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
JOJO EJONGA-DEOGRACIAS
Defendant:
STEPHEN SINCLAIR, Secretary, Department of Corrections, MICHAEL OBENLAND, Superintendent, Monroe Correctional Complex, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON and others
Hines v. Foot Locker
as 24-576
Plaintiff:
SHERELL ANN HINES
Defendant:
FOOT LOCKER, INC., SHOE SENCES, MONROE COUNTY and others
MONROE COUNTY, MICHIGAN v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
MONROE COUNTY, MICHIGAN
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MONROE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00136
Petitioner:
ANDREW MONROE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Justin CorlissIn re: Justin Corliss
as 24-1025
Petitioner:
In re: JUSTIN M. CORLISS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONROE COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
