Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Pate v. Moody et al
as 2:2024cv01860
Defendant:
Shirley A Moody and Wade Moody
Plaintiff:
Timothy Demond Pate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Dykes et al v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dykes and Braden W. Moody
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Moody v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Keith Moody
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Emrit v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement et al
as 2:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Broward County State Attorney's Office, Broward County Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pate v. Moody et al
as 2:2022cv05139
Plaintiff:
Timothy D Pate
Defendant:
Wade Moody and Shirley A Moody
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Weaver v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv03747
Plaintiff:
Devin Thomas Weaver
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Rhonda Simmous, Mike Molinary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2022cv00689
Plaintiff:
Arthur Rankins
Defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, John 316 Pallets LLC and James Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Scott v. Schnieder et al
as 2:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Vance R. Scott, Sr
Defendant:
Paul Schnieder, Paul Connick, Jr, K. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida L L C et al
as 6:2021cv00425
Defendant:
Bloomin Brands Inc and Outback Steakhouse of Florida L L C
Plaintiff:
Glen Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moody v. Walker et al
as 2:2020cv02656
Defendant:
Timothy Baudier, City of Harahan, Robert Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
