Cases 1 - 10 of 214
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. v. Moog Inc.
as 6:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Moog Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Moog Inc. v. Skyryse, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09094
Plaintiff:
Moog Inc
Defendant:
Skyryse, Inc., Robert Alin Pilkington, Misook Kim and others
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Moog Inc.
as 1:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Moog Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Moog Inc. v. Skyryse, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Moog Inc.
Defendant:
Skyryse, Inc., Robert Alin Pilkington, Misook Kim and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Halfon et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2018cv07782
Defendant:
Puget Sound Commerce Center, Inc., Foster Wheeler LLC, Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (FKA Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc.) and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Halfon and Karen Halfon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moog, Inc. v. ClearMotion, Inc.
as 1:2019cv12066
Plaintiff:
Moog, Inc.
Defendant:
ClearMotion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA, ex rel Joseph Odish, et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation, et al
as 19-1693
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE ELLISON, HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., LARRY PAGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ODISH and CRANBROOK CAPITAL CONSULTING GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel and MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
