Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 726
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff: MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant: TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11255
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01587
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Catoosa County Republican Party et al v. Catoosa County Board of Elections and Voter Registration et al
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff: Catoosa County Republican Party and Joannna Hildreath
Defendant: Catoosa County Board of Elections and Voter Registration, Tommy Davis, Ron McKelvy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love v. Kirby et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff: David Eugene Love
Defendant: Dane Kirby, Sgt. Kacy Godsey, Sgt. Katie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01238
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Moore v. Stephens et al
as 4:2024cv00269
Plaintiff: Ellar J Moore
Defendant: Beth Stephens, Chase Autwell, Jonathan J Rohlfs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felder v. Moore et al
as 2:2024cv00225
Plaintiff: Tomeka Felder
Defendant: Kevin Moore and Birmingham, Alabama, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20728
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mackey v. Moores et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff: Bakari Mackey
Defendant: Michael Moores and Rebecca Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?