Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Splond v. Moran et al
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Splond
Defendant:
Moran, Howard and Warden Gabriela Najara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Esmond et al v. Bridgeview Finance LLC et al
as 3:2023cv05664
Plaintiff:
Bryan Esmond, Ronald Moran and Joseph Nettles
Defendant:
Bridgeview Finance LLC and Sarah Reardon
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thurura et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2022cv00037
Defendant:
Zina Blancher, State of Washington, Mark Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thurura, Dustin G Abrams, Daniel Lazcono and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rapp et al v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 3:2021cv05800
Plaintiff:
John Rapp, Megan F Wabnitz and Judith Rapp
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Kitsap County, Gary Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
