Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Raymond Myers v. David Osborne
as 17-5284
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND DOUGLAS MYERS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. OSBORNE, Warden, Morgan County Correctional Complex
Joshua Dunn v. Shawn Phillips, et al
as 16-6725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
SEAN PHILLIPS, KELLY JONES, MORGAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX MAILROOM and others
Faulkner v. Phillips et al
as 3:2016cv00549
Plaintiff:
David Faulkner
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips, Gary Hamby, Jeff Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Phillips et al
as 3:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Defendant:
Sean Phillips, Kelly Jones, Morgan County Correctional Complex Mailroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mike Settle v. Warden
as 15-6367
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIKE SETTLE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, MORGAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX
Randy Anderson v. Morgan County Corr. Complex, et al
as 15-6344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY B. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MORGAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX and MORGAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX MEDICAL STAFF
Bowman v. Spall et al
as 3:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowman
Defendant:
James Spall, Tennessee Department of Corrections and Morgan County Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Morgan County Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2015cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowman
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Complex, T.D.O.C and Corizon Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rex Moore v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 14-6020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REX ALLEN MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KNOX COUNTY CRIMINAL DIV. 2, STATE OF TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Dickson v. Pennington et al (VVV)
as 3:2014cv00316
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anthony Dickson, Jr
Defendant:
Phyllis Pennington, Rhonda Arms, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
