Cases 41 - 50 of 685
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
New Ashford LLC v. Morris
as 1:2023cv03172
Plaintiff:
New Ashford LLC doing business as The Ashford Apartments
Defendant:
Keith Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Geddis v. Morris et al
as 1:2023cv02927
Plaintiff:
Marquis Geddis
Defendant:
Harry Morris, Daily Express, Inc., John Does 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Stephens v. Morris et al
as 1:2023cv02781
Plaintiff:
Jessica Stephens
Defendant:
Ira D. Morris and L&J Cox Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
MORRIS v. RUMER
as 4:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
Judge WILLIAM C RUMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Davious M. Boyd
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Kendrick Clayton, Crystal Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. State of Georgia et al
as 5:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Davious M. Boyd
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Kendrick Clayton, Crystal Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooke et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 1:2023cv02489
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cooke, Justin Estes, Joshua Garcia and others
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
