Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Steele v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024ct03081
Plaintiff:
Colell B. Steele and Colell Barion Steele
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johns v. Morris et al
as 5:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Bryan J Johns
Defendant:
William F Morris, III, Doris Morris, Randy Clapsadl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Keener v. Reid et al
as 5:2023ct03161
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Keener
Defendant:
Mr. Morris Reid, Ms. Tonya Alexander, Dr. Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hunt v. Buchholtz et al
as 5:2023hc02082
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent:
Peter Buchholtz, Morris Reid and Josh Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Ray Morris
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Morris v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Myra Morris
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Morris v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Theodore Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
