Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Andrew Plummer v. Tim Riley
as 16-7303
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW PLUMMER, an Inmate Incarcerated at the Tyger River Correctional Institution, SCDC No. 299191
Defendant - Appellant:
TIM RILEY, Individually and in his capacity as Warden of the Tyger River Correctional Institution, GERALD POTOKA, Individually and in his capacity as Chaplain of Kershaw Correctional Institution and ROBERTO ROBERTS, Individually and in his capacity as Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Defendant:
MRS MIDDLEBROOKS, Mailroom, MS LECOMPT, IGC, BARRY TUCKER, Individually and as an Agent/Employee of Tyger River Correctional Institution and others
Andrew Plummer v. Tim Riley
as 16-6340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW PLUMMER, an Inmate Incarcerated at the Tyger River Correctional Institution, SCDC No. 299191
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Individually and in his capacity as Warden of the Tyger River Correctional Institution
Defendant:
MRS MIDDLEBROOKS, Mailroom, MS LECOMPT, IGC, BARRY TUCKER, Individually and as an Agent/Employee of Tyger River Correctional Institution and others
Plummer v. Riley et al
as 2:2012cv03412
Plaintiff:
Andrew Plummer
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Ms Middlebrooks, Ms Lecompt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jonathan Edwards v. Mrs. Ogunsile
as 11-7279
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN A. EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MRS. F OGUNSILE, MR. MEDVAR, CLAYTOR, Acc Warden and others
Movant - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Edwards v. Ogunsile et al
as 0:2009cv03319
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Antonio Edwards
Defendant:
Ms Ogunsile, Mr Medvar, Warden Claytor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Edwards v. Ogunsile et al
as 0:2009cv02850
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Antonio Edwards
Defendant:
Ms Ogunsile, Mr Medvar, Warden Claytor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
