Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barry Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Mr Barry Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GLEASON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GLEASON, SR.
Defendant:
MR. BARRY SMITH, B. GETGEN and OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HENRY v. CLINE et al
as 3:2020cv00206
Defendant:
MR. BARRY SMITH, MS. K. KERI MOORE, MS. D. VARVER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HYMAN v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv04429
Respondent:
MR. BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAVON HYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KIMBLE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv01681
Respondent:
MR. BARRY SMITH, MR. JOSH SHAPIRO and MR. LEO DUNN
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS KIMBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv00334
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE (PBPP) and Mr. BARRY SMITH
Respondent:
MR. BARRY R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00086
Respondent:
Mr. BARRY SMITH, Mr. JOSH SHAPRIO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and others
Petitioner:
KALEEF JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REED v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00003
Petitioner:
JOHN REED
Respondent:
MR. BARRY SMITH, MR. JOSH SHAPIRO, CHAIRMAN OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROKITA v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv05183
Petitioner:
MARK C. ROKITA and MARK C. ROKITA, JR.
Respondent:
MR. BARRY SMITH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
