Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lee v. Wilcox et al
as 3:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Ramirez Brandon Lee and Brandon Lee Ramirez
Defendant:
DW Mr. Wilcox, DW Ms. Stewart, Warden Andrew McFarlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ravan v. Benton et al
as 4:2020cv00267
Defendant:
Counselor Townsend, Capt Judkins, Dep Warden Betterson and others
Plaintiff:
John S Ravan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flippo v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01510
Defendant:
Chad Garrett, Mr Brown and The Medical and Health Staff
Plaintiff:
Dana Flippo
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Bateman et al
as 6:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Jakelia Bateman, Mrs. Brown, Mario Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Augusta State Medical Prison et al
as 1:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Levelle Bradley
Defendant:
Augusta State Medical Prison, Mr. Conley, Mr. Shephard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lang v. Warden et al
as 3:2014cv01353
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Lang
Defendant:
Warden, Mr. Cook, Mr. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze, Mrs. Wilson, Mrs. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Scott et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Stephanie Scott, Brian Mitchell, Mark Jankoski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleeton v. Allen, et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
Leo Fleeton
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Gwendolyn C. Mosley, Willie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, W. Myers, Jeffery Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
