Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Damron v. Messenger et al
as 0:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Damron
Defendant:
A. Messenger, J. Oslin, Mr. Niccolo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parker v. Beard et al
as 0:2020cv00144
Defendant:
Mr. Lester, Mr. Travis Todd, Mr. Maza and others
Plaintiff:
Ruffin Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Chambers-Smith, et al.
as 1:2019cv02870
Defendant:
Michael DeWine, Mr. Corbett, Anette Chambers-Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallant v. Cool et al
as 2:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Mr. Cadogan, Mr. Cool, Mr. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Erdos and Jeremy P. Gallant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallant v. Cool et al
as 1:2019cv00039
Defendant:
Ms. Sawyer, Ronald Erdos, Mr. Cadogan and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy P. Gallant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Maria et al
as 2:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
Rico I. Hairston
Defendant:
Maria, Brown, Grimm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenoir v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00586
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Kenneth Ritchie, Jesse Hubbard and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar A Lenoir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Bolton et al
as 3:2014cv00580
Plaintiff:
Martin Albert Gordon
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, Dewayne Clark, Eric Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction et al
as 2:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden Madison Correctional Institution, Deputy Warden Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogan v. Smith et al
as 1:2008cv02073
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bogan, III
Defendant:
Mrs. Smith, Mr. Marsh and Mr. Emerson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
