Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harris v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Richard Harris
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Warden Lane, Asst. Warden Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Travis et al
as 3:2016cv00241
Defendant:
Rene Baker, Harold Mike Byrne, Mark Drain and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv01788
Defendant:
Mr. Adams, Mr. Ali, Ms. Beach and others
Plaintiff:
Lionell Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Hininger, et al
as 1:2014cv02127
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thomas
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, Corrections Corporation of America, Barry Goodrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damron v. Morgan et al
as 1:2013cv00467
Plaintiff:
Tracy Damron
Defendant:
Donald Morgan, C/O Salsberry, C/O Miss Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Foster et al
as 1:2013cv01836
Plaintiff:
Eric Stokes
Defendant:
Ms. Foster, Superintendant Thomas and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simon v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv01607
Plaintiff:
James Simon
Defendant:
Ms. Williams, Mr. Ganghan, Mr. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sudberry v. Jackson et al
as 1:2011cv00431
Plaintiff:
James D. Sudberry, r
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, C/O Pottenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boren v. Inspector General et al
as 3:2009cv00731
Defendant:
Baker, Barry, Batt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Davenport et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv01061
Plaintiff:
Cedric Davis
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport, Sgt. Wright, Officer Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
