Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Muhammad v. Continental Mills, Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Yahshua Muhammad
Defendant:
Continental Mills, Dr. Kenneth Parker and Matrix Absense Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rashad v. Ryder System, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Rashad
Defendant:
Ryder System, Inc., Visionary Sleep, LLC and Gustafson's Furniture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Muhammad v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kush Muhammad
Defendant:
Joshua Spaulding, Darryl Robinson, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Praylon Breed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Muhammad v. USA
as 2:2020cv00085
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McDonald et al v. DNA Diagnostics Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00391
Defendant:
Cicily Muhammad, DNA Diagnostics Center, Inc. and Natera, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jordyn R. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mallory v. Miller et al
as 3:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
James Mallory and Sadigga Al-Rahman Muhammad
Defendant:
Lt. Miller, Major William Ashby, Sgt Christopher Wedding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Burton et al
as 5:2020cv00065
Plaintiff:
James Mallory and Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhammad
Defendant:
Sgt. Burton, Mike Harold Byrne and Steve Haney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Burton et al
as 3:2020cv00122
Plaintiff:
James Mallory and Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhammad
Defendant:
Sgt. Burton, Mike Harold Byrne and Steve Haney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
