Cases 1 - 10 of 264
ROBINSON v. DC Fuel Oil Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Plaintiff:
NYJAE ROBINSON
Defendant:
DC Fuel Oil Company, Inc. and SULTAN K MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Richard v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, WELLPATH MEDICAL CO., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MUHAMMAD v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00547
Petitioner:
MU'MIT MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
Superintendent Zaken and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Carl Richard
Defendant:
Superintendent Barry Smith, Wellpath Medical Co., Dr. Muhammad Naji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUHAMMAD v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Petitioner:
MU'MIT MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
Superintendent Zaken and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUHAMMAD v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00548
Petitioner:
MU'MIT MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
Superintendent Zaken and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
as 2:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Zaken et al (CP-14-CR-987)
as 1:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Mu'mit Muhammad
Respondent:
Superintendent Zaken and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
