Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Abdullah et al v. Weigant et al
as 3:2015cv01439
Plaintiff: Abdullah Muhammad Al-Amin
Defendant: David Von Weigant, Monte D. Watkins and Beth Halstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad et al v. Millington et al
as 2:2014cv02006
Plaintiff: Hassan Muhammad and Dorce Muhammad
Defendant: City Of Millington, Officer K. Lesley, Officer N. McCarroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Donahue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00111
Petitioner: Ira Ishmael Muhammad
Respondent: Michael J. Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daphne Muhammad-Ali v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2013cv02155
Plaintiff: Daphne A. Muhammad-Ali
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. Muhammad et al
as 2:2012cv02518
Plaintiff: Antwaun Johnson
Defendant: Michael Muhammad, Decarlos Sanders, Ricky Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul-Salim et al v. Turner et al
as 3:2012cv00006
Plaintiff: Sadiq Hafiz Abdul-Salim and Yahya Bilal Muhammad Siddiq
Defendant: Ron Turner, Catherine Posey, Debra Inglis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Shelby County Dept. of Corr. et al
as 2:2011cv02871
Plaintiff: Donny Parson
Defendant: Shelby County Dept. of Corr., Correct Care Solutions, Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alkisswami v. Lamly et al
as 2:2010cv02823
Plaintiff: Muhammad Alkisswami
Defendant: James Lamly and Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00528
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Muhammad v. USA
as 3:2010cv00207
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Khaled Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?