Cases 1 - 10 of 305
WU v. BARASCH et al
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
WEIDING WU
Defendant:
RICHARD BARASCH, LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
MARTIS v. MICHERY et al
as 2:2024cv02908
Plaintiff:
MARIUS MARTIS
Defendant:
DAVID MICHERY, MARY WINTER, MARK BETOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Zicherman v. University of Delaware et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Amanda Zicherman
Defendant:
University of Delaware, Bob Mullen, Neil Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, v. ADAPTHEALTH CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv04104
Plaintiff:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
Defendant:
ADAPTHEALTH CORP., LUKE MCGEE, Joshua Parnes and others
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Wheels Up Experience Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
