Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Mullen v. Loreal USA Inc et al
as 1:2023cv14593
Plaintiff:
Marshall Mullen
Defendant:
Loreal USA Inc, Loreal USA Products Inc, Namaste Laboratories LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mullen v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv11763
Plaintiff:
Francis Mullen
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mullen v. L Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09309
Plaintiff:
Brenda Mullen
Defendant:
L Oreal USA, Inc., L'ORAL USA PRODUCTS, INC, SoftSheen - Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. State of Illinois et al
as 2:2023cv02145
Plaintiff:
Cedric B Johnson
Defendant:
State of Illinois, D Mullen, Dolton Supernaut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Celestin v. Avery et al
as 3:2023cv03217
Plaintiff:
James Celestin
Defendant:
Kylie Avery and Serena Mullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullen v. L'Oreal USA , Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03976
Plaintiff:
Vickey Mullen
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ross v. Greene et al
as 3:2023cv03017
Plaintiff:
Robert Ross
Defendant:
. Greene, . Ashcraft, Serena Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullen v. Easton
as 3:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Noah Mullen
Defendant:
Trevor Easton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullen v. Easton
as 1:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Noah Mullen
Defendant:
Trevor Easton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
