Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Hayden v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00831
Plaintiff:
Loraine N. Hayden
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE GONYEA, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Ray Brook, f/k/a FNU Gaunyea, FNU KUZNECOW, (first name unknown) Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, K. LEWIS, Physician's Assistant, FCI Berlin and others
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin, a/k/a Esker Lee Tatum, DAN SULLIVAN, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Berlin, WANDA MULLINS, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Widi v. USA et al
as 1:2016fp00445
Defendant:
Mark Argir, Cory Balinas, B. Beegle and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Widi, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
USA v. The account identified as www.maxstarhosting.com maintained by GoDaddy,Inc., 14455 N. Hayden Road, Suite 226, Scottsdale, AZ 85260
as 2:2011mj01897
Defendant:
The account identified as www.maxstarhosting.com maintained by GoDaddy,Inc., 14455 N. Hayden Road, Suite 226, Scottsdale, AZ 85260 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
The account identified as www.maxstarhosting.com maintained by GoDaddy,Inc., 14455 N. Hayden Road, Suite 226, Scottsdale, AZ 85260
as 2:2011mj01897
Defendant:
The account identified as www.maxstarhosting.com maintained by GoDaddy,Inc., 14455 N. Hayden Road, Suite 226, Scottsdale, AZ 85260 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
