Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Noorani Trading Inc. v. Amit Bijani, et al
as 23-13998
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOORANI TRADING INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMIT F BIJANI, NAFISA BIJANI, AB INTERNATIONAL, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N.F. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05306
Plaintiff:
N.F.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Noorani Trading Inc. v. Amit Bijani, et al
as 23-13280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOORANI TRADING INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMIT F BIJANI, NAFISA BIJANI, AB INTERNATIONAL, LLC and others
N.F. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
N.F.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N.F. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00888
Plaintiff:
N.F.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
N.F. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as MA/1:23-CV-11859
Plaintiff:
N.F.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc
N.F. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11859
Plaintiff:
N.F.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Does 1 - 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
