Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benjamin Donel v. Greenbelt Resources Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv07495
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Donel
Defendant:
Greenbelt Resources Corporation, Darren Eng, CF Joseph Pivinski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal - SEC Act
Donel et al v. Robles et al
as 2:2022cv07482
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Donel and Law offices of Benjamin Donel & Associates
Petitioner:
Greenbelt Resources Corporation
Defendant:
Albert Robles, CEO Darren Eng, CTO Floyd Butterworth and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ray Anthony Hensley v. City of Upland, CA et al
as 5:2020cv02462
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, City of Upland, CA, Andrew Nakamura and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Anthony Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
