Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Angela Nails v. Napier Field Police Department, et al
as 23-10473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
NAPIER FIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES DUNCAN, CHIEF OF POLICE FOR NAPIER FIELD and others
Peacock v. Alvarez-Sowles et al
as 8:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Randall Laurel Peacock
Defendant:
Nikki Alvarez-Sowles, David M. Caples, Deanna Giannini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nails v. Napier Field Police Department et al (MAG+)
as 1:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Napier Field Police Department, Charles Duncan, Chief Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Napier et al v. Henry County et al
as 1:2016cv02395
Plaintiff:
Kelly Napier and Sean Napier
Defendant:
Henry County , Damisi Gray and Daniel H. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Valentine v. Waller et al
as 6:2012cv01180
Plaintiff:
Ramon Luis Valentine
Defendant:
Margaret T. Waller, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nails v. Napier Field Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00338
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Napier Field Police Department, Charles Duncan, Chief Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
