Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. The Darren Finding Law Firm, PLC et al
as 1:2022cv05517
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
The Darren Finding Law Firm, PLC, The Law Office of Jason A. Waechter, Darren Findling Law Firm, PLC, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel I Taylor and Ezekiel Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Indiana, Indiana Department Of Corrections/MCF and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/MCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Austin
as 3:2019cv01087
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Johnson
Respondent:
Glen Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Foster
as 3:2017cv00931
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Johnson
Respondent:
Craig Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Foster
as 3:2017cv00909
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Johnson
Respondent:
Craig Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nathaniel Johnson v. Cecil Polley
as 16-1351
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CECIL POLLEY
Johnson v. Polley
as 3:2015cv01387
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Johnson
Respondent:
Cecil E Polley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson, v. Brown and Joseph, LTD. et al
as 1:2011cv02249
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johnson
Defendant:
Brown and Joseph Ltd. and Chris Hooks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Lappin et al
as 3:2007cv00269
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johnson
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Michael Nalley, Sara M Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
