Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Lowenthal v. NCR Corporation
as 3:2016cv01743
Plaintiff:
Kristen A. Lowenthal
Defendant:
NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Estate of Lovena Keever v. NCR Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03509
Plaintiff:
Estate of Lovena Keever
Defendant:
NCR Corporation and NCR Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Warner v. NCR Corporation
as 8:2016cv02378
Plaintiff:
David Warner
Defendant:
NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Meadows v. NCR Corporation
as 1:2016cv06221
Plaintiff:
Michael Meadows
Defendant:
NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hoak et al v. Ledford et al
as 1:2015cv03983
Plaintiff:
Jon Hoak , Anthony Fano and Allan Quick
Defendant:
Andrea Ledford , Compensation and Human Resource Committee of NCR Corporation Board of Directors , NCR Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Taylor et al v. NCR Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv02217
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Taylor
Defendant:
NCR Corporation, The Retirement Plan for Officers of NCR and Compensation & Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lherisson v. NCR Corporation
as 4:2013cv00548
Plaintiff:
Dejena Lherisson
Defendant:
NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Potter v. Retail Automation Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04506
Plaintiff:
Christopher Potter
Defendant:
Retail Automation Products, Inc., NCR Corporation, Empire HealthChoice HMO, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Palguta (Jacobs) v. NCR Corporation Group Benefit Plan for Active Associates et al
as 3:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Palguta (Jacobs)
Defendant:
NCR Corporation Group Benefit Plan for Active Associates and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Faulkner v. NCR Corporation
as 1:2012cv06963
Plaintiff:
Thomas Faulkner
Defendant:
NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
