Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Baxter v. Neal
as 3:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Travis Wayne Baxter
Defendant:
Randall L. Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shulman v. Olson-Boseman et al
as 7:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Neal Shulman
Defendant:
Julia Olson-Boseman, Deb Hays, Bill Rivenbark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Cawthorn v. Circosta et al
as 5:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Madison Cawthorn
Defendant:
DAMON CIRCOSTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NC BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFF CARMON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Interested Party:
Barbara Lynn Amalfi, Laurel Ashton, Natalie Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SILVA v. SCHAUDIES et al
as 1:2021cv00870
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
JESSE SCHAUDIES, VENABLE LLP, 13 MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Baxter v. Neal et al
as 5:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Baxter
Defendant:
Chuck Lee, Randall Lee Neal, Sr., Brian Matthew Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Neal v. State Employees Credit Union
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
State Employees Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
