Cases 1 - 10 of 762
MITCHELL v. WEST et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
BRANDYN MITCHELL
Defendant:
J WEST and M NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Parsons et al v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Ryan Parsons and Sondra Parsons
Defendant:
Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Other:
Neal L. O'Toole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Neal v. Town of Redington Shores, Florida
as 8:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Neal
Defendant:
Town of Redington Shores, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Neal, Jr. v. M/Y Hakuna Matata II et al
as 1:2024cv20108
Plaintiff:
WALTER E. NEAL, JR.
Defendant:
M/Y HAKUNA MATATA II, CORINA MARINE, LLC and EDUARDO MARURI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Haley v. Haley et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Defendant:
FBI Agent John Moore, Huey Frank Haley, Amber Thibodeaux Haley and others
Plaintiff:
Patty Lee Haley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
