Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Neal et al v. Frayer et al
as 8:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NEAL and ANDRE LINTHICUM
Defendant:
Brian S. Frayer, City of Mount Rainier, Maryland, Officer Brian S. Frayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Glessner v. CharDan, LLC
as 1:2022cv03333
Plaintiff:
Neal Glessner
Defendant:
CHARDAN, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Neal et al v. Fryer et al
as 8:2022cv01919
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NEAL and ANDRE LINTHICUM
Defendant:
BRYANT FRYER, R CAPLAN, CITY OF MT RAINIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01367
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Mua v. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange et al
as 8:2016cv03267
Plaintiff:
Josephat Mua
Defendant:
California Casualty Indemnity Exchange et al., Marsden & Seledee, The O'Neal Firm, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neal v. Luedtke et al
as 1:2015cv01030
Plaintiff:
Eddie S. Neal
Defendant:
Lonnie W Luedtke , Ralph P. Oakes and The City of Crisfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
