Cases 1 - 10 of 315
DRIGGINS et al v. DE JESUSet al
as 2:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
YESHONDA DRIGGINS and KIAH NEAL
Defendant:
JOSUE DE JESUS, CAR RENTALS, INC., JOHN/JANE DOE(S) 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mckinstry v. Flesher et al
as 2:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Malique Mckinstry
Defendant:
Kelley Elizabeth Flesher and Neal James Flesher
Harris v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Francis T. Chardo, Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Deborah E. Curcillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
THOMPKINS et al v. MCKEESPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY THOMPKINS, EZRA DIXON and KIM NEAL
Defendant:
CITY OF MCKEESPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF MCKEESPORT, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00309
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOWARD v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 5:2023cv03996
Plaintiff:
NEAL HOWARD
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
NEAL v. USA
as 2:2023cv01779
Petitioner:
RARJI NEAL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
